Tax Cuts for EVERYONE…
• Related • Filed Under
I’d rather take my chances on some random billionaire helping the economy, than relying on the government to do it. DWB facebook: www.facebook.com
Cowsultants.com focuses on business, finance, banking, career, credit, and debt.
Today is Tuesday, May 22nd, 2012
I’d rather take my chances on some random billionaire helping the economy, than relying on the government to do it. DWB facebook: www.facebook.com
Comment by Biggunz100 on 28 December 2010:
@drinkingwithbob you are dead WRONG! Dems want to tax and spend while Reps want to tax cut and spend. If you can’t see that then you are truly stupid.
Comment by TomWashington1776 on 28 December 2010:
Yes the ‘wealthiest’ of Americans were gonna have their taxes raised… except when did a family making $400k a yr with a mom dad and 4 kids living in a $300k, w/ 2 kids in college become UBER rich?
Comment by RATMagainstbush8 on 28 December 2010:
Umm well i hope you know yelling idiot that the democrats wanted to keep the tax cuts for the middle and lower classes while raising the taxes on the richest of the rich idiot…..
Comment by drj90210 on 28 December 2010:
113 people are welfare recipients
Comment by YogurtArchangel on 28 December 2010:
I see you’re wearing a sweater. IT’S THAT TIME OF YEAR.
Comment by aldoreshgaramok on 28 December 2010:
1:05
They’re the ones the government is deciding will get the money?
Comment by Akatam0t0ma on 28 December 2010:
Although Democrats certainly suck, it’s a folly to pretend as if Republicans are any better. They want to “spend less”? Are you serious? Republicans are almost as much of big spenders as the Democrats!
Comment by mikepike25 on 28 December 2010:
If you are looking to thank someone for leading the way on such financial disasters as the war on drugs and on terror, look no further than the GOP. Their messiah, Ronald Reagan and his disciples George Bush, Dick Cheney and others, fight for the common man by lowering taxes, primarily for the aristocratic gods of capitalism, who, with sacrifice on the part of the people, bless us with jobs at Wal-Mart, where we may sell Chinese goods like fireworks, guns, Nascar merchandise, bibles and flags.
Comment by DarkScience0 on 28 December 2010:
@USAGymnast Marxism is a failure due to the fact that not everyone is equal, in skill, power, money or anything else and nothing can make it that way. I don’t quite get what makes you think i agree with marxism. The failure of capitalism is actually pretty obvious tho. For capitalism to work everyone has to have the ability to use it. The problem with that is once an individual gains money and/or power, instead of working to continue to improve themselves they tend to use it to stop others.
Comment by DarkScience0 on 28 December 2010:
@beprep2010 The best economic times the U.S. has had in the past 70 years, was when everyone was taxed at a higher rate, including the rich. The collapses of the past 20 years occured when the rich received the biggest breaks. Just as the collapse during the last depression was due to little regulation or control of the money powers. A free market only works if everyone is free to use it and the money (or those with it it) don’t control the market.
Comment by beprep2010 on 28 December 2010:
@DarkScience0 its not giving rich people money, its letting them keep the money they earned/inherited
Comment by USAGymnast on 28 December 2010:
@carpediemfan
Liberals can’t stand that fact. They end up breeding dumber and lazier people.
Comment by USAGymnast on 28 December 2010:
@DarkScience0
You might want to take a look at your failed Marxist ideology throughout history.
Comment by carpediemfan on 28 December 2010:
@Biggunz100 We have China checkmated for several reasons the most important of which is that with our success in the middle east, we control most of their energy supply. Once again, military dominance is necessary.
Comment by DarkScience0 on 28 December 2010:
Bob, I certainly hope you don’t actually believe that republicans have your best interests at heart.
Republicans want you to work till your 70 (average death for an american male 74.2).
Republicans want to privatized your benefits, those things most folks have been paying for decades. They now want to give their banker friends 25% of your benefits to run what the government does for 5%.
As to your claim that if you give rich people more money they will make jobs, failed back in the 80s.
Comment by Biggunz100 on 28 December 2010:
@carpediemfan Rome failed using that logic and so will the USA. If China called in all it’s US debt tomorrow the Federal Reserve would have to print so much money to pay it and the inflation caused by the printing would require you to buy a wheelbarrow to carry enough money to buy a loaf of bread. Entitlements, military and just about every govt bureaucracy will be seeing major cutbacks…I hope…
Comment by Biggunz100 on 28 December 2010:
@gibblets17 The federal reserve is not part of the government and as people we have zero control over it. The big banks make up the federal reserve and in 1971 Nixon took the dollar off the gold standard and gave the banks the power to print fiat money mainly through debt. The federal reserve can and did create trillions of dollars out of thin air to bail out failed banks without touching our tax dollars…though the inflation created is going to kick us straight in the ass with higher prices.
Comment by carpediemfan on 28 December 2010:
Unlike entitlements, our military is a necessity for our economic health as it gives the dollar reserve currency status which basically allows us to print money and make the rest of the world pay for it. Quit whining for a free lunch. Entitlements just give dumb people a reason to out breed the smart people and are therefore horrible for society in the long run.
Comment by HabitualHobosexual on 28 December 2010:
“I’d rather take my chances on some random billionaire helping our economy” – Please hold your breathe for that.
Comment by HabitualHobosexual on 28 December 2010:
But republicans do spend a lot but its on weapons programs and wars. Plus one thing tax cuts for rich has taught us is it doesn’t equal jobs.
Comment by 615Deathdealer on 28 December 2010:
Why dont we give money to the consumers and have them drive up demand insted of giveing it to the people who have a fuck load of money already, and who will spend on thier 4th jet or some shit like that,
Comment by cbm1234567 on 28 December 2010:
50% chance they spend the money? Your statistics make me laugh.
Besides that, what happens if big companies don’t spend the money to make jobs, then what happens? Them money goes to waste, ofc. So for the past however many years, companies weren’t spending the money on jobs as needed, so why give them a tax break?
I know you don’t like big government, but if companies don’t spend on jobs, then the money would be better off going to the government, since they’re more likely to create jobs.
Comment by whatamericaneeds100 on 28 December 2010:
idk where you get the 50% chance, probably made it up like all your other statistics, republicans dotnt want to tax you less and spend less, they want to tax the rich less, tax the middle and lower classes a litle more and spend MORE, it DOESNT WORK, learn from history people,
Comment by demon515 on 28 December 2010:
Good job painting issues in black and white and uses tired old talking points that have no basis in fact.
Comment by TheMango121 on 28 December 2010:
@Auriono
Um…. No?
How bout ending 1 trillion dollar a year wars? You don’t have to raise taxes to fix the deficit. You need major cuts in spending.