Irwin Schiff vs. IRS on Fox TV News


www.GiveMeLiberty.org — Fox TV News interviews tax protester Irwin Schiff. Watch as famous NY tax attorney is unable to cite any law requiring average Americans for file or pay. Schiff‘s website is www.paynoincometax.com.

Tag:

does peter schiff receive income in british virgin islands, peter shiff/mortgage settllement 2012

Related Interesting Article You May Read

    There Are 25 Responses So Far. »

    1. On October 24, 2005, Schiff was convicted in the U.S. District Court in Las Vegas, Nevada, he was sentenced to 12 years and 7 months in prison and was ordered to pay over $4.2 million in restitution to the Internal Revenue Service, he was also sentenced to 12 additional months for contempt of court.

      anybody that wants to see the income tax law, google: “Title 26 – Internal Revenue Code”; the law is there and it’s constitutional

    2. @giddygiddy85

      “People” have authority, a person does not

    3. @RetSquid just answer me this question either A or B…. Q. who has more authority, A. a living man of flesh and blood who thinks and has feelings and shit, or B. the government which exsists of course as ‘a piece of paper’

    4. @thnksmarter

      Exactly…and the People say you cannot ignore the law, not without punishment.

    5. @RetSquid bullshit. who the fukk says you are not free to ignore the laws?? The Supreme Court rules plenty of them unconstitutional. Guess who has more power than the government and the Constitution? The people.

    6. @giddygiddy85

      You have a right to travel but you do not have a right to drive a car. You also do not have a right to cross borders, how do you think the Government can control it’s borders without a system for identifying it’s Citizens? Without borders there is no country.

    7. @RetSquid its all an act.. they tell us wer free to travel, but i need a license to drive and a passport to travel, governments wer set up to protect your right not take them away,seriously what authority do you think these people have over you, if i told you ‘your gonna need a licence to walk’ would you ask me how much is it, or would you question what authority i have to tell you what to do, if our creator is the number 1 authority, do you think universal law has the government as numero 2????

    8. @giddygiddy85

      “The claim that Title 26 was not enacted into ‘positive law,’ has been rejected as ‘frivolous,’ ‘baseless,’ ‘specious,’ and ‘preposterous.’ [Citations omitted]”
      United States v. Maczka

    9. @giddygiddy85

      The Internal Revenue Code of 1954 was passed by both houses of Congress as House Resolution 8300, and was signed by President Eisenhower on August 16, 1954, at about 9:45 a.m., becoming Public Law 83-591, 68A Stat. 3. The Internal Revenue Code is now known as the “Internal Revenue Code of 1986” as a result of changes made by Public Law 99-514, 100 Stat. 2085 (10/22/1986).

    10. @giddygiddy85 – title 26 internal revenue code is the income tax law

      ‘code’ is short for codified law

      you realize irwin schiff is back in prison again, right

    11. the laws of a country are different to the acts of government, title 26 isnt a law, its a code, my school used to have its own school code but it wasnt the law, theres no point on me trying to explain it to you anymore, maybe if your govt didnt dumb you all down it might make sense, did you know that for some1 in usa to graduate high-school they have to do a multiple choice exam,most people in ireland have to do about 40hours of exams in 2weeks on between 9-10 subjects.nuff said

    12. @giddygiddy85

      Sorry, The U.S. is a corporation and a country. TItle 26 is the law and you gave your consent by residing in in the U.S. You are ‘free’ to leave anytime you want. You are not free to ignore the laws of the country.

    13. @RetSquid title 26 is the code for the united states which as you said yourself is a corporation, this so called law doesnt apply unless u give consent, and dont say it has nothing to do with consent, if you dont have the power to not consent then how can you call yourself free

    14. @giddygiddy85

      Title 26 IS the law, goofball. It is the Prima Facia evidence of the law, unless you can prove it is different from the actual act passed by Congress, it is valid.

      An “ACT” is what a “LAW” is before it is passed by Congress and signed by the President.

      All “muders” are illegal, by definition. “The unlawful killing of another human being”.

    15. @RetSquid title 26 of what law? seriously do you even know the difference between a law and an act? have you ever heard of an illegal murder?

    16. @duranward

      Copy those and put them in the search box on here.

    17. @RetSquid how?

    18. @heightboosting

      Go watch the video and check out my comments on there.

      watch?v=N331kGvh0U0

      watch?v=BSW_M5_jPkA

    19. @RetSquid explain yourself..

    20. @giddygiddy85

      Yes, I have seen the law, go look at Title 26 Sections 1, 61, 63, 6012, 6151.

    21. @RetSquid the problem here is that your cant believe youve been lied to all this time…classic case of denial and stockholm syndrome….. have you personally seen the act where it says you have to pay income tax, cause everybody is looking for it, and i do believe it is you who has been suckered i dont pay any tax and my govt give me $250 a week to do nothing,

    22. @duranward

      That movie is full of lies and misinformation.

    23. watch aaron russo’s film freedom to fascism
      educate yourselves and dont let yourselves be bullied

    24. @giddygiddy85

      There is no such thing as the “british accredation registry”. There is a thing called the “bar”, which is a voluntary society of lawyers. Some States have an ‘integrated bar’ which is not voluntary. You do have to pass the bar exam to be a lawyer.

      Obviously, I think more than you, you have been suckered into some strange anti-truth cult.

    25. BAR stands for british accredation registry,and its not voluntary,you have to pass their test to be a lawyer, they are a society and they have their own rules and language(legalese),why do you try so hard to argue a point which you obviously havent a clue about, i see your ex navy so you probably can’t think for yourself and need to be told how to live.. but only god has authority over you and he has given everyone the right to travel, do you think jesus would have a passport or licence today

    Post a Response